Boogie Nights (1997)-Paramount Summer Classic Film Series

 

I could have sworn I'd written about this film before, but as I looked for any version of a review on the site I came up empty. It must simply be that I've talked about it with other people on a regular basis and so I thought I had actually written something about the movie. There are a couple reasons why this feels somewhat personal, but it has nothing to do with my drug use or participation in the adult film industry. Many of the reasons that I identify with this film have to do with the time and setting of the movie, which in some ways do parallel my own life.

The house that Eddie, our main character, lives in with his parents, before he becomes Dirk Diggler, is in Torrance California and it looks exactly like the home of my college debate partner who lived in Torrance. The interior layout and the exterior Frontage might very well have been filmed in his neighborhood. In 1981, which would be in the middle of the time that this film is set, I had a summer job making deliveries of photographic supplies to a variety of businesses, and one of my routes consisted of the San Fernando Valley. Famously, this was the home of the pornography industry at the time, much like it's depicted in the film. Some of the locations that I made deliveries to were in fact producing magazines that were largely pornographic. So I have a tangential connection to what was going on. The one element of the film however that most closely connects me to the story, is maybe the most compelling scene in the film, the drug deal that goes wrong. One of my closest friends in college took a wrong turn and ended up working as a low-level drug dealer, in the valley. By the time he was doing this I only saw him occasionally for lunch or to talk to on the phone just to check in. I was not immersed in his lifestyle, except that there was one experience when we met for lunch and I drove him to a location where he was making drop off of his supplies. It was one of the most uncomfortable experiences I ever had with him. A year later he was murdered by his partners in the drug business. So although the experience is not exactly the same I can certainly share the perspective of how crazy and dangerous the times were.

My personal connections with the story aside, this is an incredibly watchable movie that is propulsive and uses needle drops and inserts to create a sense of verisimilitude. There are some truly great performances in the film, Mark Wahlberg gives us a desperate, insecure character in the last act, for whom you can feel surprising sympathy. Philip Seymour Hoffman is a minor character in the film, but he develops a sense of pity from us that feels quite realistic. Burt Reynolds notoriously disowned the film, but his performance in it, as the father figure / pornographic film director, is one of his career best. Julianne Moore, William H. Macy, Robert Ridgely, John C Reilly, and a dozen other players all create characters with big faults that we still find ourselves empathizing with, to our surprise.

I was flying solo at this performance at the Paramount, and I got there a little bit later than I usually do. I had to sit near the back on the orchestra level because the theater was packed for this Thursday night screening. The audience was incredibly receptive, and Paul Thomas Anderson, who is not making his debut with this film but for whom this was my first exposure, impressed me and everybody else with how this movie was put together.

Fantastic Four: First Steps (2025)

 

One of the guests on the Lambcast covering "Fantastic Four First Steps", quoted Theodore Roosevelt "comparison is the thief of joy." I can see how this is true in many respects, especially when looking at films from a similar genre. It is nearly impossible however to ignore comparisons when the film's open within a week of one another and both of them are comic book icons. Superman and the Fantastic Four come from different Studios, have slightly different sensibilities, long range purpose seems to be dissimilar enough that a comparison might be unnecessary. I think an exception has to be made however when both films embrace their comic book roots so thoroughly.

"Fantastic Four First Steps", like James Gunn's recent Superman film, accept the concept that they come from a comic universe. The Superman film features a pocket universe in a different dimension. Some of the threats that appear on screen are interdimensional beasts, which are Illustrated to be comic book monsters. In the Fantastic Four film, the universe is traversed by a faster than light spacecraft, and our heroes encounter a villain who looks like he stepped out of a Transformers movie, with pretensions to becoming a star of a Godzilla film. It is a completely wack idea, but it is straight out of the comic books of the era. That's what makes this retro version of the Fantastic Four so much fun.

I've created an artificial statistical measure, to trace the Joy from each of these films. 80% of my enthusiasm for Superman comes from the dog Krypto, a CGI character who is more realistic and which behaviors seem more real than most human actors are capable of achieving. I loved every minute of the Superdog in that movie. In contrast, about 70% of my enthusiasm for the "Fantastic Four First Steps", comes from the Retro stylings that have been pursued by the filmmakers. This movie personifies the aesthetic of a 1960s comic book set in a future world, as imagined by the artists of the time. The vehicles used by the Fantastic Four look like spaceships designed by imaginative 12-year-olds from 1960. There is a sharp pointed a trifold fin arrangement and a ring which encircles the vehicle which renders it capable of light speeds. Back at home, the Fantastic Four Drive a flying car that reminded me of George Jetson. The uniforms worn by the Fantastic Four looked like they could have come out of a Thunderbirds movie or maybe Fireball XL-5.

Vanessa Kirby plays Sue Storm (Richards since she and Reed are married and expecting. She is the Invisible Woman. There might have been some anxiety that she would be turned into a girl boss in a woke version of this comic. Instead she is the embodiment of 60s values, a loyal and loving wife and a fiercely devoted mother. The fact that she is competent in her job and cares for the family that surrounds her makes her a figure of sympathy and affection rather than a symbol of feminists rejection of a traditional male female relationship. In other words Sue is a hot woman with a husband that she loves and a job that she's good at. On top of that she's about to become a mother, and motherhood becomes the defining characteristic of this hero.

Pedro Pascal feels a little bit Overexposed at this time. In spite of that, I enjoyed him as Reed Richards / Mister Fantastic. He does bring a certain gravitas to the story even when we're talking about giant space monsters who eat planets. The other actors in the film were fine as well but it was clearly Vanessa Kirby who is making the greatest impact in the movie.

I also like the fact that this was mostly a standalone film, not dependent on a series of TV shows or prior films for me to be able to understand what the heck is going on. Although it will ultimately be connected to the larger MCU, at the moment it feels fresh and distinct enough that I think it could survive on its own as a film series, if people are willing to commit to it. I said it in my review of Superman that I enjoyed the film but I was not enamored with it, for the Fantastic Four I think I can say I enjoyed the film and I was enamored with it. That's a good feeling to leave a theater with. 

The Wild Bunch (1969)- Paramount Summer Classic Film Series

 

It only happens occasionally but this is one of those times, a film will enter my regular blog posts, but also be included in the Strathmore film project. Strother has a minor part in his great 1968 Western directed by Sam Peckinpaugh, a man that Strother had worked with before and would work with again. Any film fan is familiar with the Wild Bunch and it's significance as part of the new Hollywood.

An elegantin Western sit near the end of the frontier days, the Wild Bunch is about the passing of old ways, and the violence that ensues. The film stars William Holden, Ernest Borgnine, Ben Johnson, and Warren Oats as a band of Outlaws whose competence is in question, and who is being pursued by a posse of prairie scum led by their former compatriot played by Robert Ryan. As surprising as it might seem there are themes of loyalty in the film, and when considering the nature of these men, loyalty is not one of the characteristics you would expect. In fact there is a clear example of such hypocrisy at the very beginning of the film. In escaping from the town and the trap that had been set for them, they abandoned their youngest member, to be set upon by the citizens after the others have escaped.

There is virtually no one in the film that could be described as an honorable person. Everyone is guilty of some form of murder or theft. However, there are moments when the bandits act with dignity, and a sense of a moral code, that seems so foreign to the way they act to the rest of the time. In addition to the issue of loyalty, the biggest theme seems to be autonomy. No one in the film, from the bandits to the Posse to the Mexican soldiers, wants to be told what to do or how to act. The desire to have command over your own decisions seems to be a strong motivator, especially for Holden and Borgnine.

Robert Ryan as an aging Bandit himself, now trapped into leading a posse against his former partners, is the poster child for the theme of autonomy. His inability to act in the manner that he wants, and the fact that he is forced to work with characters for whom he has disdain, is another driving force in the film. Two of the scum that ride with the Posse are TC and Coffer, played by Buddies lq Jones and Strother Martin. If there is anything close to comic relief in the film by these two losers, who bicker with each other like an old married couple over issues like whose bullet killed a victim in the streets, or which one of them gets to keep the boots of the latest dead man they have found. While Pike Bishop and Dutch Engstrom are hardly models of social nicety, they certainly Tower over the likes of Deke Thornton's mob of Misfits.

Sam Peckinpaugh  became famous for the stylized violence in his films, often featuring slow motion deaths. This is the film that probably initiated that reputation. The movie is bookended by two over the top shootouts, which feature Mass deaths in slow motion bullet holes and falls. If there is a third theme running through the film, it may be that violence is inevitable and inevitably futile. There is a coda to the film which also includes violence, but after the massacre of the Mexican troops and the Wild Bunch itself, Peck and Paul wisely allows the massacre of the Posse to occur off screen. So anyone who says that Peck and paw shows no restraint must have missed this last scene.

There's a lot more to the movie than the two big shootouts, but I'll leave that for another time. I have no doubt that I will return to the Wild Bunch for a separate entry on the Strother Martin film project. For now it's just a pleasure to have seen the film once again on the big screen, and bathe in the Macho themes and images that dominate this movie.

Superman (2025)

Comic book films continue to dominate the theatrical Marketplace in these times. We've already had two MCU films this year, Captain America Brave New World and the Thunderbolts / the New Avengers. This week it is the DCEU that gets an opportunity to reassert itself at the box office. The new phase of DCEU films, supervised by James Gunn, kicks off with a reboot of DC's Premier superhero Superman.

This newest version of Superman is different from both the 1978 Richard Donner film and the Zack Snyder films of a decade ago. The Christopher Reeve film was optimistic with a strong sense of humor based on characters, and the relationship between Superman and Lois Lane was at the center of the story. In the Zack Snyder version Superman and Lois finally get together, and it seems to make both of their lives miserable rather than fulfilled. There was almost no levity in these early DCEU stories.

This Superman is a true comic book version. There are heroes and villains from other worlds and dimensions. Lex Luthor continues to be the main antagonist, but he is operating in a world of science Foods the concept of a pocket universe, where you can store all kinds of things, like your enemy is for instance. There is a more typical story in the film, where Luther is going to benefit from a war that he is encouraging. To get to that objective however requires that his character utilize resources that seem far more valuable than any real estate he would acquire from his deal with one of the warring Nations.

Meanwhile, beast from other dimensions show up to threaten Metropolis, and give Superman and the other Heroes of the poorly named Justice gang, something to do when they are not fighting off Luther's plans. One of the Green Lanterns is part of this group, he's played by Nathan Fillion, and it appears to be an iteration that people who love comic books hate. I thought the character was repulsively Charming. Not someone you would want to spend time with, but someone who is perfectly capable of making good decisions and carrying them out. Two other Heroes appear in the Justice gang, Hawkgirl, has next to nothing to do in the film, so it's not quite clear why she has been made a part of the story. The super intelligent Mr. Terrific on the other hand, practically steals the movie with his clever approaches to problem solving, and sarcastically detached attitude.

Lois Lane, he's a big part of the story, in fact becoming an active player in attempting to Fort Luther and rescue Superman. Rachel Brosnahan," The Fabulous Mrs. Maisel", plays Louis as a resourceful reporter, who considers it her obligation to challenge Superman on his decisions, in spite of her relationship with him. Ma and Pa Kent also appear in the film, but unlike previous versions of the story, their presence is not meant to evoke Maudlin sympathy, but rather to illustrate the differences in nurturing parents and the role they play in creating the ethos of a person. So you can feel safe and watching the film, and being aware that there is no eminent death scene Superman's adopted father.

Frankly for me the main attraction in this film is a secondary character with no dialogue, who exists only in CGI, but still had more personality and humor than any of the human actors. Krypto, is Superman's dog, and he has powers very similar to the Man of Steel. Of course he is a dog and so his doggy personality largely dictates how those Powers get used. When Krypto gets the Zoomies, you can expect chaos to ensue. David Corn sweat who plays Superman / Clark Kent displays the perfectly correct attitude when his dog is taken. Is temper tantum is completely Justified, and Luther should know in the long run that he's going to pay for screwing around with someone's beloved pet.

There is a plot twist concerning Superman's Kryptonian parents, it really seems that odds with the mythology of the comic books and previous films. It Doesn't Kill the movie, but it does undermine our willingness to embrace this version of Superman the way we did when Christopher Reeves and Marlon Brando we're on the screen.

This is definitely a comic book movie, featuring cartoonish monsters, and science fiction premises that defy reality. The movie looks very good however, and I had fun for the 2 hours that I was watching it. I guess the easiest way to express my opinion about the movie is to say that I enjoyed it, but I was not enamored by it. 

Sorcerer (1977)-Paramount Summer Classic Film Series

 

One of the greatest films of the 1970s is also one that is largely forgotten. The reasons for this are complex but include the fact that this film came out in the wake of Star Wars, replaced that film on the Chinese Theater screen for only a week, and then was replaced itself by Star Wars. This was the film that no one knew what to do with, it's an action adventure film with protagonists who are all loathsome in some way. Their heroic actions are always mitigated by the fact that they are criminals, terrorists, fraudsters, and murderers. When your rooting interest is someone that you would avoid if you cross paths with them on the street, it's not hard to imagine that a film is going to struggle to find an audience.

“Sorcerer”, may be William Friedkin's best film, and he made “The Exorcist” and “The French Connection”. This sweat-laden, rain soaked, mud  encrusted thriller,  will not leave you with a warm feeling, but it will leave you with deep admiration for the director's skill at building tension and following characters through their true natures.

This was my first time seeing the film on the big screen. I only caught up with it on cable years later, and then finally when the remastered Blu-ray came out about a decade ago, I Revisited it andI appreciated the story. Seeing it in a theater however, is truly a great experience. There are sequences in this film that are so fraught with tension that I felt like sweating myself. Those of you not familiar, the main part of the story focuses on four displaced men, struggling in a poverty stricken Village in the nameless South American country, who take on the job of transporting volatile explosives 200 miles across the jungle.

The first half hour of the movie however, has nothing to do with the main adventure, it simply details what these four men were like before they came together in this anonymous part of the world. Each of their stories has a degree of vibrancy to it that makes their subsequent activities feel more important. Roy Scheider plays the displaced American, a gangster who is wanted by other gangsters for a crime back in the States. There is also a Palestinian terrorist, a French financier, guilty of a massive fraud, and a professional assassin as part of this team of drivers taking on this hellish task because they are desperate.

Perhaps the most amazing part of this film is that it was shot without CGI, or in a studio. The road that this group has to travel is filled with dangerous sinkholes, impossible to pass barriers, and a raging river with a rickety bridge that will give you nightmares. All of it is on screen and all of it is real to some degree. Of course some of the biggest threats come not from nature but from other men. There is revolution in the air, and there are criminal elements who take advantage of the Revolutionary impulses of others, to steal and kill.

Although we got backstories for all four of the drivers, Scheider remains our main protagonist, and our link to the civilization that seems largely out of reach In this jungle locale. As is typical in 1970s films, the ending of the story is downbeat, but not at all in a manner in which you expect. The inevitability of our guilt catching up with us is one of the main themes of the story. I'm not sure if that's a part of the original film  this movie is based on. I have seen that movie, but it has been a long time and I didn't have the context of this film to compare it to at the time.

So if you want to feel your sphincter tighten, and have your sympathies be conflicted, then you should make it a point to see this film. And of course if you get a chance to see it on the big screen you need to put your money down and go.

Deep Blue Sea (1999) Revisit -2025

 

Sometimes you just need shark movies to make your summer sing. I just saw “Deep Blue Sea" on the big screen a year ago and wrote about it then. I'm not sure that there's a lot to add. This Renny Harlan action film takes full advantage of an ocean location, and Genetically Enhanced sharks, to give us a few Frights, and suspense to sit through.

I can't wax poetically about the film the way my former co-host on the Lambcast can, but I can appreciate that this may be the second best Shark film ever put into theaters to make summer audiences happy that they paid their ticket price. The presence of Samuel L Jackson, makes the first half of the movie a lot more suspenseful than it really is. I do think that we could probably do with a prequel film that explores the Avalanche experience where Jackson's character survived. Spoiler alert: he doesn't have the same level of success with the sharks.

Thomas Jane as our hero Carter, does a great job looking well and acting frightened. When we get to the end of the film, it's a little bit more believable because this is the way he's been throughout the movie. LL Cool J makes a good impression as an actor, but they ran the rap song he did for the movie right before the film screened, I think moving into acting was the right choice. Maybe our favorite lines that we've quoted for years come from his advice that the perfect omelet is made with two eggs not three. I follow that advice whenever I'm making breakfast.

The Magnificent Seven (1960) Paramount Summer Classic Film Series

 

After having spent 2 hours in the presence of Cary Grant and Grace Kelly, one may wonder how any stars in another film could compete for our attention. The second film in our Sunday double feature answers the question in the most obvious way, multiplying the number of stars. Magnificent Seven gives us a half dozen great actors in a meaty part in a western. That's the way you follow up with star power.

Yul Brynner and Steve McQueen may not match Kelly and Grant straight up, but that's okay because they're also supported by James Coburn, Charles Bronson, Robert Vaughn, and Eli Wallach. There are also a few secondary level Stars that make the movie worthwhile as well, and Elmer Bernstein score is a star in its own right.

You probably already know that this is a remake of Seven Samurai but set in the West. It works really well as a band of mercenaries help a local Village fight off marauding Bandidos for 2 hours. There are several clever moments in the film, but there is one glaring plot problem. Eli Wallach's character grants the seven their weapons back after having caught them by surprise through the betrayal of one of the villagers. This was a mistake on a massive scale by the supposed brains of the marauding bandits. The only justification for it, is to allow Our Heroes to come back and claim victory. It's a head scratching plot point.

Regardless of that fault, leads in this film provide plenty of fireworks for the movie. This film actually made Steve McQueen a star, but James Coburn was not too far behind him. Most people who think that Charles Bronson was merely a tough guy face on the screen, should pay attention to his character Ark in this film. He gives a pretty good speech to the kids who have attached themselves to his character.

The assembly of the band of Heroes that takes place in the first part of the film is more interesting than the conflicts in the village. In the long run most of the characters get a chance to reflect their reason for being included in the band. A lot of people might think that the Italian westerns of Sergio Leone were the start of the anti-western, but the depressing circumstances of Our Heroes here, very well could have been a precursor to those themes. It just doesn't seem that being a gunfighter paid very well, or provided a comfortable lifestyle. Everybody in this film, from the villagers to the bandits to The Mercenaries seems depressingly miserable.

Regardless of their misery however, we get some pretty good gun fights, some clever twists, and maybe not A Fistful of Dollars but A Fistful of Stars. This film is never going to be as perfect as Seven Samurai, but it is pretty damn good.

To Catch a Thief (1955) Paramount Summer Classic Film Series

 

Another Hitchcock film for the Paramount classic summer film series 2025. I've seen To Catch a Thief before, but it has literally been decades since I last saw it and I remembered very little of it. I did remember a substantial amount of the Cary Grant Grace Kelly by play. And I did remember who the actual Thief was, but I'd forgotten the machinations that Grant's character had to go through to discover the truth.

The movie doesn't have the suspense of most of Hitchcock's films, but it does have a lot of romance and the spectacular location they probably made for a fantastic summer vacation for everybody involved. Just as a quick reminder Grant's character was a jewel thief before World War II, but became a resistance fighter for the French during the war, and was seemingly reformed. A new series of thefts from the resorts on the French Riviera point to him becoming active again as a criminal. He has to discover who is using his MO and try to vindicate himself.

It's easy to see how people in the 1950s, might not care very much about the plot of the film when they have these two exquisitely beautiful people to look at. Cary Grant and Grace Kelly may be the most magnetic couple on screen in that particular decade. The buy play between them is humorous, and if you've seen any of the Steven Soderberg oceans films, you'll have a good sense of where the humor in those films come from.

This was the first film of the double feature that we saw on a Sunday afternoon, and it was a delightful way to spend the late afternoon.

Jurassic World Rebirth (2025)

 

If you can get rid of most of the stupid things in the Jurassic Park Franchise, synthesize most of the best action beats, and cast it with a little flair, you will get a movie like this. It exists, it is fun while you watch it, but it is not essential, it does not say anything profound, and it still has plenty of stupidity that is fairly original. 

I don't know that there's much to say about a new Jurassic World film. After all you get dinosaurs chasing people, eating people, and people making sacrifices or showing themselves to be scum. So it's pretty much the same story every time out. The main variations involve the actors people and how are the characters  going to screw each other over. Oh and whether or not the dinosaurs are going to be interesting.

For the most part the dinosaurs in this particular Edition are interesting. The premise of the film has scientists in Pursuit of DNA from three specific varieties of dinosaur. One that is found in the ocean, one that is found on the land, and big surprise one that flies in the sky. That seems to set up a pretty straightforward path for our adventurers to travel.

Scarlett Johansson plays a mercenary who is tasked with getting the team there on to the island and then helping them secure the live DNA samples that they need. She has a team of Misfits, many of whom are really just food for the dinosaurs, an evil Overlord who is there to exploit nature, so we get some moral story included. And then there's a random family of shipwreck survivors who get included in the Expedition so that we can have kids and people who aren't used to carrying around heavy weaponry.

It's all creative enough fun to kill a Saturday afternoon in the summertime. There is a little bit of tie in to previous variations of the series. For instance we start off in Manhattan with a brachiosaur slowly expiring in a local park. There's a mild climate change theme, it mostly goes nowhere except to justify a trip to the equator. Marashala Ali is Johansson's Main support, and he's a good actor who is wasted in a largely thankless part. When we get to the climax of the film, we get the stupidest third act twist imaginable, and whatever suspension of disbelief we had up to this point is lost.

Anyway go ahead and turn off your brain, get yourself an extra large soda and don't worry if you have to run to the bathroom during the movie, you're not going to miss anything important. Because there's nothing really important here, just some fun watching dinosaurs chase and eat people.

Materialists (2025)

 

It looks like a romantic comedy, it's cast like a romantic comedy and IMDB labels it as a romantic comedy, but at best it is a deconstruction of the genre. There are a couple of moments when I laughed at the uncomfortably frank expectations of the matchmaker clients. Both women and men have standards that seem impractical at times, although some of their criteria are also perfectly valid. Overall however, the film is more of a drama, highlighting the uncomfortable and overwhelming feeling of loneliness. 

In a twist that perfectly illustrates the contrary nature of the film, the two male leads are the cardboard cutouts, and it if the female lead that has the real story arch. Dakota Johnson is solid as the matchmaker at the top of her game, who can't quite figure out her own life. Her clients have lists of boxes that they want checked off, but her character is not sure what her own boxes would be. She resists being put into any boxes herself, either from her former lover played by Chris Evans, or her new pursuer, the unicorn Pedro Pascal. 

Two thirds of the way through the film, there is a pretty nasty turn which seems to undercut the comedy of the film entirely. The tone of the movie shifts rapidly and Lucy, the Johnson character, finds her confidence in her job completely shaken, and her commitment to her current relationship undermined. She wants to see herself as a friend to her clients, but clearly, the financial conditions of their relationships prevents her from giving the smack upside the head that so many of these people need. 

The main actors are all quite good, Pascal has an easy charm for most of the movie, although the character feels a bit reconfigured by the third act. Evans plays anxious and disappointed well, and Johnson oozes sincerity, in spite of having to be a snake oil salesman in the long run. The resolution of the movie works on an entertainment level, but it does not really address the reservations that the script has been giving us for most of the story.

Piranha (1978)

 

It seems like there were dozens of "Jaws" rip-offs in the late seventies. Killer Orcas, Grizzlies, and in this film, genetically modified piranha that can strip a man to the bone in minutes. This was an exploitation picture that launched the career of director Joe Dante. It has only a little of the sideways humor that characterizes his best films, but it does try to keep the audience engaged with frequent piranha victims every few minutes.

The formula is a clear set of beats stolen from "Jaws". We start with a titillating experience that results in death, followed up by a slow discovery of what is happening, and then a series of denials of reality by officials. One of the main differences is that the obnoxious character who is trying to dismiss the whole thing, gets a comeuppance, unlike the mayor in the shark movie.

Bradford Dillman was a seventies staple as a suspicious official or businessman, and he was in a ton of TV shows of the era. Here he plays a drunk hermit like loser, who hets turned into an action hero for no particular reason. Heather Menzies, who played one of the Von Trapp children in "The Sound of Music" and Strother Martin's daughter in Sssssss, is a bounty hunter who gets caught up in the action, and veteran horror icon Kevin McCarthy starts a long association with director Dante, playing a crazed scientist. Don't ask why there is a small lizard man walking around the laboratory in the early part of the film. It never becomes important and it is simply a loose thread.   

"Piranha" is an efficient, low budget fright film. The film makers do the best they can with their resources and imaginations. Although many consider it a cult classic, it simply feels standard for the times. But of course those were my times so I loved it.

F1 : The Movie (2025)

 

I have to admit something here that is a repeat of a prior realization. I really like sports movies about sports that I have no interest in otherwise. My favorite sports films over the years have been hockey films, but I have never been to a hockey game and I think I may only have watched a complete one, once on television. Auto racing will take a close second place. I have no desire to spend a day in the stands watching cars drive by at high speeds, but I am more than willing to spend a couple of hours in a movie theater doing the same thing. In the last decade I have seen, "Ford vs. Ferrari", "Rush" and "Gran Turismo", and enjoyed them far more than I would expect given my disinterest in motor sports. You can now add "F 1" to the list.

This movie is pretty conventional from a plot point of view. A talented driver, who missed a shot at the biggest prize in his field, gets a chance at redemption, but must compete with a younger version of himself to succeed. It helps that the star is charismatic and Brad Pitt fills the bill on all counts. He is incredibly watchable, even in a helmet that hides eighty percent of his face. I have seen this movie compared to "Days of Thunder", largely because the plot points are not dissimilar and that film also relied on star power to give the audiences what they want.

The biggest success of this movie however is making the technology behind Formula One racing, feel accessible to outsiders and novices like me. I have known plenty of gearheads in my life, but I have never been one of them. You add a layer of mechanical engineering and physics to the mix, and suddenly the garage is more of a laboratory and a lot more interesting. Director Joseph Kosinski made "Top Gun Maverick" a couple of years ago, and it is clear he knows how to get the best out of action scenes in vehicles. The camera work and editing of the races is thrilling and envelops you with tension and excitement. This is one of the most entertaining films of the year.

It is not my intention to slight the other actors in the movie, they are fine. I think Damson Idris has a bright future in films, but Pitt is the show here and if you are not a fan, you could easily become one. This is a movie star, action driven, summer blockbuster that pushes all the right buttons and fives us the thrills tha we want for a couple of hours, without having to sit through a whole race. Like hockey films, these racing movies cut out all the stuff that non-fans don't care about, and feeds us the dessert served with a little movie star sauce on the top. 

Zodiac (2007) Paramount Summer Classic Film Series

 

Most of the entries coming up will be brief, I am still trying to catch up on posts for all the theatrical screenings in the last couple of weeks. I cannot however, skimp on my opinions about this particular film. "Zodiac" has been one of our family favorites since we saw it in it's original theatrical release. Over the years, it has become a default movie for us. Whenever we have trouble deciding what we should watch , someone inevitably suggests "Zodiac" as an alternative and nine times out of ten, we are watching it again. This screening at the Paramount Theater was the first time I have seen it in a theater since 2007, and it is the first time since I started blogging, that it gets included on this project.

I was eleven years old when the Zodiac killings started drawing press attention across the state of California. So I was old enough to be aware of the story, but still young enough that it did not obsess me the way that it did the characters portrayed in the story. Robert Graysmith , as portrayed by Jake Gyllenhaal, is a cartoonist for a San Francisco newspaper, one that received messages from the killer. His tangential connection lead to an intense desire to know who the killer was, and he wrote the book this movie is based on. Director David Fincher, portrays the writer as an innocent bystander, watching the horror play out around him. Gyllenhaal looks like a baby-faced kid among the police and newspaper professionals that surround the case. His sincerity is achingly displayed on his face as he asks questions of his colleague Paul Avery, who is covering the Zodiac for the paper. Avery is played by a pre-Iron Man Robert Downey Jr. Avery is also presented as an obsessive, but his pursuit is more professional and it consumes him in a different way than Graysmith.

The third leg of the tripod that the story of the investigation rests on is Dave Toschi, a police inspector in charge of the S.F. part of the investigation. Mark Ruffalo plays Toschi as an overwhelmed professional, frustrated by jurisdictional impediments and inconsistent evidence. The two newspaper guys supplement and interfere with his task, but ultimately, it is Toschi who gets to chillingly interrogate a suspect that seems to fit the information that they have. All three of these men get moments of horror as they confront individuals or places that may be a key to solving the crimes. Downey Jr. is playing a character who descends into alcohol and drug use as his paranoia and professional life collide. There is an honesty about those destructive forces that may be a reflection of his real life struggles in the years that preceded this film. Ruffalo seems to be calmly frustrated reacting to both the killer and his amateur pair of Zodiac hunters. 

Everyone in the movie is top notch in their performances, but I will single out two of the supporting players to show how well the movie is put together. Toschi has a partner, Bill Armstrong, played by Antony Edwards. Armstrong is a dedicated professional but he remains more impartial than Toschi. He is analytical but not obsessive.  Edwards exudes competence with an aura of detachment. He wants to solve the case as much as his partner, but he doesn't let the frustrations of the case overwhelm him. Edwards is the cool straight man to Ruffalo's, only slightly warmer counterpart. They make a great team. 

The second outstanding secondary performance is by John Carrol Lynch, who plays the eventual main suspect, Arthur Leigh Allen. We only see Allen in the context of the investigations. There are no scenes where he is depicted as the killer engaged in the crimes. We learn about his character in interviews with his former friends and family. When Toschi, Armstrong and two other law enforcement  personnel question him at work in the break room of the facility he works at, all sorts of alarms are going off in our heads as the cops listen with gapped mouths to the explanations and information that Allen shares. Lynch is calmly aloof as he spills suspicious conduct and details to the investigators. His face never reveals a fear that he is trapped, or that he is on alert in the face of the questions he is getting. His quiet comment "I am not the Zodiac. And if I was, I certainly wouldn't tell you." is as chilling as some of the murders that we see depicted in the film.

The verisimilitude of the film is found in a thousand places in the movie. The location shots are all consistent with the era. There is a sequence with Melvin Belli, a famous attorney who was a celebrity because of the lawsuits and clients he was involved with His depiction reflects the commercial television practices of the time. Toschi is shown attending a special screening of "Dirty Harry" which is a film that has a character inspired by the real life criminal he is pursuing. One of the most haunting and realistic uses of music of the time occurs in the attack on the couple in a car at the start of the film. Donovan's "Hurdy Gurdy" man plays out over the scene, and you can almost smell the aura of the 1960 descending on the moment.

I would not classify this as a horror film, just as I would not say "The Silence of the Lambs" is a horror film. There are certainly frightening moments but the key is realistic suspense. These are thrillers with horror elements. The creepiest scene takes place in a basement, and there is no blood, weapon or violence shown, but the hair on the back of your neck will certainly stand up at the moment. Charles Fleisher, who is best known as the voice of "Roger Rabbit", provides an additional supporting character to make this movie the masterpiece that it is.  

"Zodiac" was not a huge success when it was first released, but there has been a lot of reassessment in the last two decades and I think you will find that this movie will hold your attention, frighten you and haunt you for a long time. I  am happy to have had a chance to see it again in it's natural habitat and I encourage everyone to spend some time with this excellent film. 

 

Working Girl (1988) Paramount Summer Classic Film Series

 

Ladyhawke/The Hitcher Paramount Summer Classic Film Series: Robert Rodriguez Presents

Richard Kirkham · Ladyhawke 1

Richard Kirkham · Ladyhawke 2

Tremors (1990) Paramount Summer Classic Film Series

 

The Big Lebowski (1998) Paramount Summer Classic Film Series

 

28 Years Later (2025)

 

I was a big fan of the original "28 Days Later" from 2002, and I also appreciated the sequel "28 Weeks Later" as well. I expected a "28 Months" movie fifteen years ago but it never materialized. So instead, almost 28 years after the original (really only 23) we get a legacy sequel which tries to restore the franchise to life, which is an odd thing considering that many people consider it a zombie film. Regardless of how it is classified, the new film stays relatively true to the preceding movies, with a couple of variations that are bootstrapped in to make the story feel more substantial and original.

An idyllic community has been established on a coastal island, which is only accessible on a bridge that is only accessible during low tide. While there is a threat of infection from the mainland, that possibility is remote. The bigger issues facing the community are limited resources, lost knowledge and in one case, the absence of medical facilities that might be life saving. The community has become a cult of rituals, meant to perpetuate the group and prepare youngsters who were born into this cloistered society, how to deal with the world they live in. The first act of the film is a father-son bonding ritual which involves confronting the outside world, killing some of it, and surviving the terrors that exist on the mainland. Spike, a twelve year old who trusts his father and adores his mother, gets confronted with a confounding situation when his expedition reveals things about his Dad and the world that his mend is not ready to handle.

If there is a weakness in the story, it is not in the action or characters but rather in the short sighted thinking of a kid. His motives are pure but his method is nuts and he should know that. The story becomes a quest for help that lays past the sections of the map that in the old days would be labeled "Here there be dragons".  Spike is resourceful, but there are a couple of convenient moments that solve problems that he would have been unable to manage on his own. There is a good deal of tension in this middle section, as the threat of rage-infected humans looms around every corner. he action is intense, and the escapes are narrow, and the complications are interesting.

The third act is mystical and disturbing, and it is almost a polemic on euthanasia.  Ralph Fiennes appears as the most interesting character in the story, and his narrative, while a little preachy, does give us some issues to think about. The conclusion of the movie will throw you off, but I understand that if you live in Great Britain, it will make a lot more sense. There are apparently two sequels coming so Aaron Taylor-Johnson, who plays the dad, will probably be back after disappearing from act two and most of act three. Jodie Comer will be missing for an obvious reason, but that should not surprise anyone who makes it into the movie for twenty minutes. By the way, the opening, which is a revisit to the onset of the zombie apocalypse, is smashing. Those sequences in these kinds of films usually are. 

When Harry Met Sally (1989) Paramount Summer Classic Film Series-ReWatch

 

Although listed as part of the Summer Classic Film Series, this screening of "When Harry Met Sally" was a combined event with author Katherine Center and one of the city’s most famous couples, Jared and Genevieve Padalecki. As such it required a separate admission from our Premier Passes.  We spent an interesting hour as the couple interviewed the author about her summer romance novels and her latest product.

 The conversation was filled with warm jokes and shared romantic experiences. It was billed as an evening of romance and I guess you could say that for the fans of the authors work, it was a success. Amanda has the book and when she is done with it I will attempt to read it as well. What really brought me to the event however was the chance to return to one of the perfect Romantic Comedies of the 1980s, and a pairing of actors that was magical.  

When I wrote about the film as part of my TCMFF coverage a few years ago, I mentioned that it was the movie that I took my wife to see for our anniversary that year. When we watched the clips of the old married couples, which were dispersed throughout the film, we laughed and imagined the stories we would be telling when we were that age. We made it to 38 years together, but we didn't get a chance to tell the stories like those couples in the film.  I will do a little of that here. Unlike Harry and Sally, we met in High School, not at the end of college. Our senior year was full of rivalry flirtations since she went to a different school than I did. Although Harry initially hits on Sally, he is not smitten with her and they part ways. Dee and I went differently, although I was hesitant at first, the more time we spent together, the greater the attraction for both of us. I never mocked her food selections at a restaurant, she was not used to eating out and we split a lot of meals.

The kibitzing between Harry and Sally however, was something we shared with the characters. Both of us were smart-alecks and had fun teasing each other or ragging on others under our breath. Harry has twisted philosophical comments through out the film, and Sally has incisive insights into men and women that reflect Harry's behaviors. They are a great match although they resist the pull of romance for most of the film. We never did that part, we dove full in. Billy Crystal has a deflective way of commenting on everything, and that style of humor turns out to be perfect for the tone of the film. Meg Ryan was at the height of her "cute" stage and she played the insecurity of Sally perfectly. Bruno Kirby and Carrie Fisher practically steal the movie as their best friends who find love in each others arms and wonder what Harry and Sally are doing with all the dance.

Nora Ephron was the queen of the smart romantic comedy and her screenplay here is marvelously witty and not overly sentimental, in spite of the old couples inclusion. Director Rob Reiner was in the middle of one of the greatest runs of fil
ms by a director ever, with "The Princess Bride' right behind him, and "Misery" and "A Few Good Men" coming up next. The synergy of the actors and creatives make you want to order whatever they were all having for lunch.

We all hope that Harry and Sally will be our story, where we fall in love with our best friend and find long term happiness. I don't mean to brag, but that is exactly what I did. What a lucky guy. 

 

Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (1989) -2025 Revisit

 

Let's face it, if Sean Connery is in a movie, I want to see it. Sunday we did two Sean Connery films. 
Highlander" and "The Untouchables". That is a very satisfying Father's Day. 12 years ago we did a different double feature of Sean Connery films, "Goldfinger" and "Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade. If you would enjoy a little piece of history, below is a vlog post I did for that event. 

We went to see the film again this week, almost exactly a year after our last big screen viewing, which you can read about here: Last Crusade 2024. 

I don't have a lot of new things to say, I have written about the film many times before, but as I promise in the header, "If I Saw it in a Theater, you will read about it here."

The chemistry between Connery and Harrison Ford is incredible, It's too bad they did not get a chance to work together again, because I could imagine an action film like "The Hunt for Red October" with a cerebral thriller featuring these two great actors. I love the scene between them on the airship where Indy is reminiscing about their strained relationship and Dr. Jones Senior takes him to task for leaving just as he got interesting. The flummoxed look on Harrison Ford's face and the defiant tone in Connery's voice made for a humorous but also personal moment in the film. 

Connery also got to ham it up with Denholm Elliot in several scenes and leave us with a much better impression of his character than the stern and cold father that Indy remembers. When in doubt, ALWAYS see "Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade", and always see it on a big screen. 

Father's Day Sean Connery Double Feature/Robert Rodriguez Paramount Summer Classic Film Series

Highlander (1986) 

 I saw this film with my wife when it first came out and we enjoyed it but frankly, I did not think it was a great film. It is a popcorn picture that looks a little cheaper than it should. They must have spent most of the budget on Sean Connery for his brief time in the story. I enjoyed Christopher Lambert in "Greystoke: The Legend of Tarzan" two years before. He was okay in this film, but it was clear that he was going to get by on physical charisma in his career and not acting chops. Clancy Brown on the other hand, understood the assignment and went full on nuts. He mugs and hams it up, just the way his character should.

Sean Connery, shows up for the second act and plays the part of a mentor to Lambert's Conner MacLeod. Much ridicule has been made over the years of his being cast as an Arab, from Spain, with a Scottish Accent. However, it may not be inconceivable that in the 1200 years he was alive, he picked up some traits from all the places that he's lived. Also, if that is the credibility stretcher for you, you have not been paying attention. 

The best element of the movie is the notion that immortality takes it's greatest toll on those that we love and must leave as they die. MacLeod suffers from his loss obviously, but the strain on his Scottish wife was pretty well drawn in the film. Another character from the 20th Century illustrates it as well. I don't want to give the movie too much credit, it is still a cheesy piece of pop fantasy, but it is completely watchable and I enjoyed the revisit.

Local Director and friend of the Paramount, Robert Rodriguez, hosted and scheduled this program. He does a nice job talking about the films and the film makers that he had connections with. He shared his story about this movie in the conversation you can listen to below.

Richard Kirkham · Robert Rodriguez Sean Connery

The Untouchables (1987)

The second film in our double feature is the terrific Brian DePalma movie, "The Untouchables". It is impossible to imagine a better Sean Connery part (with the exception of the film I will be writing about next). Connery plays a put upon beat cop, who has resisted temptation and played straight with the law instead of getting into bed with mobsters. He becomes a mentor to the enthusiastic but as yet untested Elliot Ness, a Treasury agent, in pursuit of Al Capone.

The relationship between Ness and Jimmy Malone (Connery) is funny, fatherly and frustrating at times. Jimmy needs to trust Ness and Ness takes some getting used to because of some tentative characteristics. The team gets substantially enhanced by Andy Garcia as a rookie cop, with deadly shooting skills, who gets drafted into their unit. Garcia is fine in the action scenes but doesn't have as much to say in the rest of the plot. Charles Martin Smith however, as Treasury Accountant and agent Oscar Wallace, is a delight in bringing a spark to the team because of his distinctive background. He is the square peg that they find a way to fit in.

The bad guys are pretty vivid with Robert DeNiro hamming it up as Capone. Billy Drago is a chilling Frank Nitti and his comeuppance is one of the great satisfactions of the film. DeNiro's scene with a baseball bat in his hand is his big moment on screen. The scene is directed with the usual style of Brian DePalma, it is elegant, and suddenly violent in an ugly way. The two big set pieces of the film are the border raid and the train station shootout. Both of these are strongly enhanced by my favorite Ennio Morricone score. 

I have seen this movie dozens of times, and probably a half dozen times on the big screen. My first viewing was at the Cinerama Dome in Hollywood when the movie opened in 1987, it remains another hallmark moment in my Dome history. I am glad I can now pair it with a screening at the beautiful Paramount Theater in Austin.     

Babe (1995) Paramount Classic Film Series

 

Frankly, there may not be a more charming film in existence than "Babe". The story of an orphan pig who tries to find his place in the hierarchy of the farm is just too sweet not to love. It charmed the hell out of us back in 1995 when my kids were seven and nine. I took the youngest with me to this screening, she is now thirty-seven and she still loves it. (She will deny it, but I suspect it played a big part in her aversion to pork). 

This film won the Academy Awards for effects the year it came out, over the shots of a space launch and rescue mission in "Apollo 13". That win should be an indicator as to how animation and CGI were soon to dominate the film landscape. This was also the same year as "Toy Story" so you can feel the earthquake and aftershocks with those two movies.

James Cromwell received a big boost to his career after this, and we were very sad that we missed him at the TCM Film Festival, talking about this movie, back in April. We did get to see it on the big screen through the "Paramount Summer Classic Film Series" and although it was promoted as a kids matinee, there were plenty of adults there to share in the pleasure of our talking pig hero "Babe". The relationship between Farmer Hoggett and his pig is a complicated one with a couple of grim moments, but Cromwell makes a joyous human who learns to trust his instincts and his porker buddy. 

The Greek Chorus of Mice that introduce the various chapters of the story, are still amusing 30 years later, and when the lead sheepdog, swallows his pride to get help for "Babe" from the sheep, we get a few life lessons as well. I do think having a duck do the rooster's duties would be a lot of fun here at the house.

This movie was such a change up from the shark serial killer movie of the previous evening. Maybe all double features should work this was as a one-two punch, start with something hard hitting and then finish with something heartwarming. Two good days at the movies.

Dangerous Animals (2025)

 

It was fifty years ago, this month, that "Jaws" the greatest film of the last eighty years, first dropped into our collective culture. Ever since that day, film makers have been striving to recapture the essence of the film. Some have stuck to the basic horror narrative, using the sharks as a monster to hook us into watching. A few films (especially TV movies) have tried to parody shark films into action comedies with varying degrees of success. Only occasionally, has a shark film created a aura that was reminiscent of the classic, "The Shallows" being the most recent example I can think of. This new film, "Dangerous Animals" tries a different approach and succeeds in getting the tension right, and the horror appropriate. It is not anything close to the quality of film that "Jaws" is, but it has some things going for it that make it my favorite film of the year so far.

If you watch the trailer, you will understand the premise very quickly. We have a serial killer whose method of murder is feeding his live victims to ravenous sharks while the victim is still alive.  This is potentially a gruesome horror film that could be classified as exploitation, except for the fact that director, Sean Byrne, has learned his Spielberg lessons well. Instead of extended scenes of sharks dismembering the poor subjects of the killers plans, we see just enough to be terrified, but not enough to be revolted. There is blood in the violence, but it is not the over the top fountains of a horror film like "The Monkey". If ever a horror movie could claim to be in gory good taste, this one is probably it.

The big advantage that this movie has over other exploitation films is that it has two dynamic characters that are really interesting. The main character is Hassie Harrison, as Zephyr, an itinerant American, surfing the coast of Australia. She is emotionally damaged, we can see that, but she is not unreachable as her one night stand with a friendly local explores. She is also not a mere damsel in distress. She is smart, resilient, and relentless in trying to fight back against the antagonist. Zephyr is not simply going to resign herself to a fate that she becomes an eyewitness to, she is going to struggle in any way possible to keep living. She may not be the easiest character to love, but she is clearly one that we are happy to root for, time and time again.

One of the faults of some thrillers is the good luck that the victims sometimes run into, which allow them to escape and give us unearned hope. This movie turns that trope on it's head. It is the killer who ends up with all the good luck on his side as he repeatedly thwarts Zephyr in her escape plans. Jai Courtney is Tucker, the deranged serial killer who can mask his evil with an avuncular round of "Baby Shark" one moment, and then a knife in the throat the next. I have seen in in half a dozen other movies over the last few years and he always seemed to me to be a guy who was just missing it. An actor who would have occasional moments but never enough to be memorable. He was bland as you could get. This film however, gives him a part that is screaming for some charisma, and he delivers. Courtney has the glint in his eye of a maniac, and the physical form of a damaged brute. It is impossible to take your eyes off him when he is on screen and that says something because his counterpart is attractive as heck and in a bathing suit for most of the film. 

The script allows us to believe a few things that are unbelievable. The brief fling that Zephyr has with local Moses, becomes for him an obsession, only in a good way. The fact that Moses and Zephyr are surfers and they are connected by a particular beachfront spot, becomes a key point in building up a chance that Tucker could somehow be derailed. Zephyr knows what is coming because she also meets Heather, a fellow pawn in Tucker's twisted game. If there is any heart in the film outside of the truncated love story, it is in the few minutes that Heather and Zephyr share as they await their fate.

Sharks are in the film, but first time screenwriter Nick Lepard and director Byrne, seem to know that the fish are the least dangerous animals in the food chain of this thriller. Their role is kept to a supporting part, which makes them all the more effective when they do come into play. For some reason, this film is not getting many screens or much publicity, which is really unfortunate because, like the mother of all shark films, it is really not a horror film as much as it is a thriller. I know it is produced in partnership with Shudder, which is a horror outlet, but you are selling the movie short if you keep it in that box. This is a great twist on the great white, and in spite of the fact that it is being promoted as from the producers of the excretable "Longlegs"  you should seek it out.